Powerful Hard to Find and Thought Provoking Essays by Thomas Paine
All of the following essays and letters are found in LIFE AND WRITINGS OF THOMAS PAINE, edited by Daniel Edwin Wheeler, 1908, Vincent Parke & Co., New York. If you take the time to read these thought provoking, enlightening and entertaining writings, you will find yourself with a much deeper understanding of God, Deism, and religion. They are well worth the read! Feel free to print any of these essays and letters to spread the word. Also, all of these important essays are in Paine's book, The Age of Reason, The Complete Edition (for Kindle version click here).
To further deepen your understanding and appreciation of Thomas Paine visit Ian Ruskin's site The Life of Thomas Paine. Ian is a gifted actor with a profound desire to make the world a better place by educating people about their reason and rights. One important and inspiring way in which he does this is by portraying Thomas Paine in an enlightening and thought provoking one man play To Begin the World Over Again: the Life of Thomas Paine. Click here to view video clips from the play on YouTube.
There is more great news regarding Deism, Thomas Paine and Ethan Allen - there is now a new documentary out which covers all three! American Freethought, a film by Roderick Bradford, is a four hour documentary which, unlike most documentaries, actually covers Deism and its importance in the lives of Thomas Paine and Ethan Allen. Click here for the documentary page.
Of The Religion of Deism Compared With the Christian Religion
Dutch Translation: De Religie van het Deisme vergeleken met die van het Christendom
Dutch Translation: Bijbelse Godslastering
Old Testament Prophecies of Jesus Proven False - I
Old Testament Prophecies of Jesus Proven False - II
Thomas Paine Exposes a Bishop to Deistic Bible Study!
Thomas Paine Makes Clear the Difference Between Deists and Christians is Reality!
Thomas Paine's Speech on Deism and Atheism to the Theophilanthropists
The Tower of Babel
Dutch Translation: De Toren van Babel
Of Cain and Abel
Inquiring Into the Truths or Falsehoods of Religions
Of the Old and New Testament
Thomas Paine's Bible Study of the New Testament
Thomas Paine's Thoughts on Christian Revival Meetings
A Letter to a Friend Regarding The Age of Reason
Thomas Paine on Death
Thomas Paine's Thoughts on a Future State
Correspondence Between Thomas Paine and Samuel Adams
Thomas Paine Reprimands Bishop Moore For Taking Advantage of Alexander Hamilton
Thomas Paine Reprimands Clergyman Mason For Taking Advantage of Alexander Hamilton
Thomas Paine on the Word "Religion"
Thomas Paine on Calvinism
Thomas Paine on the Sabbath-Day
Worship and Church Bells
Thomas Paine on Christian Missionaries
Thomas Paine on Freemasonry, Part I
Thomas Paine on Freemasonry, Part II
Thomas Paine Defends His Open Deism
A Humorous Poem by Thomas Paine - The Monk and the Jew
Please inform everyone you know about this page and the important ideas of Thomas Paine it offers through his essays and correspondence.
KEYS TO A SPIRITUALLY-BASED LIFE: fifty tenets of a new faith, by author M A Street. "I believe in the divinity of God and only God, that grace is the sole divine gift from God to humankind, and that the fruit of grace is service." What do you believe? Click here to order from Amazon!
The People Who Live In The Moon
by fellow Deist Paul Heider, Jr.
This is a story about the human race and why they had to leave their home planet and settle on Earth. It documents some of the advances they made and mistakes they suffered on their home world, and the war that brought them so close to extinction. Their superstitions and advanced technology almost killed them all, but cooler heads taught them the value of logic and reason. When again they were faced with total obliteration they worked together and agreed to try and save the human race.
Click here to order your copy of this thoughtful and entertaining eBook that promotes Deistic principles in fiction format for only $4.99!
High Quality Graphics Work Done Promptly and Professionally by a Fellow Deist! To learn more contact Franklin at email@example.com
In my talk on pluralism and the giving of offence, I mentioned my 1994 essay on Thomas Paine that had been censored by the Independent because I opened it with a quote from The Satanic Verses. Here is that essay, in the form in which it was finally published. And this is the quote from The Satanic Verses that was felt to be too offensive. It describes the moment that Salman, the scribe who writes down the revelations that Mahound receives from the angel Gibreel, begins to entertain doubts about the nature of those revelations (Mahound is the pejorative name, derived from the Crusaders, that Rushdie gives Muhammad):
Salman the Persian got to wondering what manner of God this was that sounded so much like a businessman. This was when he had the idea that destroyed his faith, because he recalled that of course Mahound himself had been a businessman, and a damned successful one at that… After that Salman began to notice how useful and well timed the angel’s revelations tended to be, so that when the faithful were disputing Mahound’s views on any subject, from the possibility of space travel and the permanence of Hell, the angel would turn up with an answer, and he always supported Mahound, stating beyond any shadow of a doubt that it was impossible that a man should ever walk upon the moon, and being equally positive on the transient nature of damnation.
The Satanic Verses, p364
This essay is both a coda to my talk and a complement to my interview with Jonathan Israel on the Enlightenment, religion, equality and tolerance.
The Second Age of Unreason,
Independent, 28 January 1994
I was going to being this piece with a quote from The Satanic Verses in which Salman Rushdie satirizes the divine origin of the Qur’an. It was felt, however, that this would be too provocative and insensitive. It is ironic that having been commissioned to write a piece on Tom Paine, the greatest freethinker of his age, I am unable to use a quote from a freely available book because it might cause offence to do so. It is a demonstration of the continuing relevance of Tom Paine to contemporary political discussion.
Tom Paine would have approved of Rushdie’s novel. Few authors have so punctured the pretensions of organized religion or savaged the claims of divine revelation as Paine. And fewer still have faced such ridicule and vilification for doing so.
Two hundred years ago today, Paine published part one of The Age of Reason, a book that was to become The Satanic Verses of its day. Paine said of the book that it was a ‘march through Christianity with an axe’. Just as his previous major works, Common Sense and The Rights of Man – a defence of American independence and the French Revolution respectively – laid the axe of reason to the tree of feudal despotism and monarchical corruption, so The Age of Reason laid it to the other prop of national superstition and imposture, the established Church. ‘All national institutions of churches’, wrote Paine, ‘whether Jewish, Christian or Turkish, appear to be no more than human inventions, set up to terrify and enslave mankind, and monopolize power and profit.’
True belief, argued Paine, derived from the exercise of reason. If the Bible was true, it must be consistent with external evidence and rational argument. Yet by any measure of reason, the Bible could only be held up to ridicule: ‘Were any girl that is now with child to say that she was gotten with child by a ghost, and that an angel told her so, would she be believed?’ Paine went through the whole of the Scriptures, from the stories of Creation to the Resurrection, demolishing their claims to truth. The Bible, he concluded was not the world of God, but work of man, and moreover one written to maintain power and privilege of the feudal elite. It had no place in a rational, democratic society.
Paine’s polemic created a storm like no other. In England The Age of Reason was suppressed for decades and successive publishers imprisoned for blasphemy. Anyone who distributed, read or discussed the book faced prosecution. Some were arrested for simply displaying the portrait of the author. In America, where hitherto Paine had been fêted as a hero for his unwavering work as a publicist for independence, newspapers denounced him as a ‘lying, drunken, brutal infidel’, ‘a lily-livered sinical rogue’ and ‘a demihuman archbeast’. A century after Paine’s death in 1809, the US President Theodore Roosevelt could still describe him as a ‘filthy little atheist’.
What terrified the authorities was not so much Paine’s arguments (his ideas were already familiar within deist and Unitarian circles) as the popular audience to which he appealed. As in all his writings Paine aimed for a readership of common people, writing in the plain style of ordinary speech and transforming the ideas of the few into the property of the many. The Age of Reason became an assault on the established order, and one that was accessible to the masses.
Despite his trenchant critique of Christianity, Paine was no atheist. He was a deist who thought that science itself demonstrated the existence of a God. Since all things must have a cause, he argued, and since the universe could not have created itself, something must have created it. And that something – the ‘First Cause’ – was God. Whatever one makes of Paine’s deism, the attempt to bring reason to the study of religion was an enormous leap forward, flowing as it did out of a desire to outlaw prejudice and unreason.
In the final account, Paine’s greatness – and his relevance for us today – lies less in what he said than in how he said it. Paine had what we would now call attitude. He was intransigent, provocative and cocksure. He mocked authority and deferred to no one. He had no time for custom, no reverence for the past. Edmund Burke wrote of him that he sought ‘to destroy in six or seven days’ that which ‘all the boasted wisdom of our ancestors has laboured to perfection for six or seven centuries’. To which Paine replied: ‘I am contending for the rights of the living and against their being willed away, and controlled, and contracted for, by the manuscript-assumed authority of the dead’. For Paine the living were fully capable of organizing their lives without any recourse to the dead.
Most of all, Paine had little fear of offending people, particularly in authority. He would have been astounded at the pusillanimity of liberals towards The Satanic Verses affair. Paine would have recognized that much of the anti-Muslim rhetoric was fuelled by racism and would have combated it – he was, after all, the author of African Slavery in America, a fierce polemic against racial inequality. But the idea that we should be any less trenchant in our criticism of religious dogma and superstition of whatever kind for fear of ‘offending’ people would never have occurred to him. Above all, Paine would have been contemptuous of the deference that contemporary journalists and commentators show towards authority and tradition, and of the general disinclination of our age to confront, to provoke, and to question. The central thrust of all his work was to teach the ordinary reader to question all forms of received wisdom and to demand their right to participate fully in political life. Would that there were a few more Tom Paines (and many fewer Edmund Burkes) today.
The images are all of cartoons mocking Paine. From top down: George Cruikshank’s ‘The Age of Reason; or the World turned Topsyturvy exemplified in Tom Paine’s Works!!’, now in the British Museum; James Gillray’s engraving ‘Tom Paine’s Nightly Pest’; and Gillray’s ‘Thomas Paine’, now in the National Portrait Gallery in London.
Categories:Atheism & Religion, Free Speech • Tags: christianity, edmund burke, enlightenment, free speech, offence, religion, rushdie affair, the satanic verses, tom paine